-
Megajournal mismanagement: decision bias anomalous activity at PLOS ONE - ScienceDirect
-
Blog Archives - PLANT ECOPHYSIOLOGY @
-
Nexus | Academic
-
PNAS rebrand: Improving in its many forms | PNAS
-
How why to publish in PNAS
-
Long Does Peer | Edanz Learning Lab
-
Viral density and time regulate the reactivity pattern of CD4 T-cell responses vaccinia virus
-
Introducing PNAS Review Pilot | Updates | PNAS
-
Windowed\query{ Please contact PNAS\string\[email protected] if have about the editorial changes, this
-
Why this editor won't be sending your paper out for further at PNAS | Sociobiology
-
Structural functional innovations in the real-time of (βα)8 barrel enzymes
-
Quantum spin-liquid states in an organic magnetic layer molecular rotor | Forro - Academia.edu
-
PNAS Impact Factor 2022 - Journal Factor
-
PNAS: Tighter Policy Improves Papers - The Scholarly Kitchen
-
Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, receive fewer citations |
-
PNAS tips & Journal | Editage
-
Pulse-induced nonequilibrium dynamics of acetylene inside carbon nanotube by an ab approach
-
PDF) The spreading of online
-
Editorial Journal Policies - PNAS
-
Information for Authors | PNAS | Oxford Academic
-
PNAS wouldn't authors cite unpublished manuscript. Now, it was wrong. Retraction Watch
-
influences students' performance on tests
-
Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, receive fewer citations |
-
A computational neural model of momentary subjective well-being Rutledge Lab
-
on Twitter: isn't a slight on PNAS - it's the reality of scientific publishing, particularly when everyone is crazy busy. But there's an alternative. Preprints *do* get reviewed by
-
Long Does Peer | Edanz Learning Lab
